Last week, news emerged from Star Alliance – or rather a change in the terms and conditions of their elite program. Star Alliance was absolutely silent. The essence of the news was a change that meant even flyers previously entitled to lounge access were no longer guaranteed it in some circumstances, unless they were also flying business class.
In other words, the status the worked hard to attain would be useless in certain scenarios, unless they paid for a more expensive ticket. Even though this was more death by 1000 cuts than just going for the jugular, I’m calling BS – because loyalty is a two way street.
At airports where neither a Star Alliance branded lounge nor a Star Alliance member carrier offers a lounge, third party lounges are contracted by some of our member airlines. As a Star Alliance Gold customer travelling on a Star Alliance member airlines operated flight from such airports, you may have access to these third party contract lounges. Please refer to the Lounge Finder to identify which lounges you may have access to, according to the policy of each airline*.”
*Check the current policy of the airline with which you are travelling.”
The essence of loyalty programs is to entice behaviour from customers outside of their usual pattern, or to retain their business and keep travellers away from others. Think of a loyalty program like a hotel where you provide everything someone could possibly need, so they never consider venturing out to the cold dark world.
This new policy means that if a Star Alliance member airline lounge isn’t available, and instead it’s a PriorityPass style lounge you’d have access to, the airline isn’t necessarily obliged to provide access based on status, though most will.
The thing about a status like Star Alliance Gold is that it often takes inconvenience to reach it. By all normal methods, it takes thousands and thousands in spending and in some cases, choosing a lesser preferred routing or a higher fare to stay loyalty. Like all alliances, it’s not always easy to stay loyal, but we fight through it for the perks. That must work two ways, and…
That’s why this is BS.
Sure, some people qualify for Star Alliance Gold without a blink of an eye, but many travellers will find themselves inconvenienced at some point in the qualification process. That extra connection, the flight that’s a bit more expensive than other airlines; or that inferior cabin you choose along the way – you know the deal.
By stating that hard earned “butt in seat” loyalty benefits only apply when it is convenient for the airline in question – surprise, surprise, this was a concession to United – Star Alliance invalidates the proposition entirely. Why should I potentially concede things for you, if you won’t for me?
Lounge access is an absolutely key benefit to frequent flyers, and one of the few things a traveller can depend on and enjoy with each journey. Upgrades are hardly ever guaranteed, so lounge access has always been one of the few typically defined points in deciding the value of loyalty. If it’s not a sure thing, it all changes…
This is yet another dangerous journey in the direction of turning loyalty programs into one way streets of occasional use. Star Alliance isn’t exactly first here – Qatar Airways for example has lounges only for paid business class passengers, regardless of their status – but they also provide lounges for all the passengers with status too.
It’s one thing to offer a better option to a person paying a significantly higher fare for business class, but it’s another thing entirely to invalidate benefits on any one journey. I’d say I’m a decent example. I spend at least $25,000 a year on mostly transatlantic business class tickets. In Europe, I never both with business class. A small but wonderful perk of funnelling that spend towards one alliance is the pay off on those short journeys were I’d otherwise go without, as an economy passenger.
You take that guarantee away, my possibilities with other airlines grows immensely. Though I love a few airlines in the Star Alliance, like Singapore, ANA, EVA and Swiss, this change makes me glad I’m a Oneworld slash Virgin Atlantic guy… at least until someone else gets a big idea like this one…